Marketing Dissertation Data Analysis Sample 4

The first question of the online survey was directed towards the understanding of social entrepreneurship concepts on which the respondents have to mark the suggested definitions according to their understanding level of social entrepreneurship. It can be comprehended from the table presented above that around 23% of the respondents marked the first explanation of the social entrepreneurship which stated that the individuals with innovative solution towards the society’s most pressing social problems. Secondly, for the statement that social enterprise is a charity which is used as a social media technique for fundraising for which 27% of the respondents out of 100 were in support of this statement.

The third statement speaks about that the social entrepreneurship is an independent business where the individual’s acts as an agent of change for the environment of the society on which 25% respondents out of 100 marked to this statement. The fourth statement speaks about the social entrepreneurship statement that the social enterprises are about looking for the solutions for the poor people problems to which 25% of the respondents marked the following statement of the social entrepreneurship. However, from the total results for the question, the majority of the respondents were in the support of the explanation that the social enterprises are a charity which uses social media for fundraising.

From the question presented above which was directed towards the assessment whether the respondents were interested in being a social entrepreneur. To this question, a total of 40% of the respondents responded in the favour of being a social entrepreneur that includes the scale of very interested and interested. In addition, there were 29% of the respondents who remained neutral with this question to which it was asserted that either they were not aware of the question or are indecisive about the fact that whether they want to be a social entrepreneur or not. On the other hand, there were 31% of the respondents who refuted from becoming a social entrepreneur.

The table presented above is aimed towards the assessment that the respondents of the study are interested in what sector for becoming a social entrepreneur in Indonesia. For this question, it was asserted that around 10% of the respondents want to be the social entrepreneur in agriculture sector, 6% were interested in reducing poverty by introducing NGOs, 20% were interested in the healthcare sector, 28% of the respondents were interested in the education sector, 12% were interested in the fishery sector and the remaining respondents accounting for 24% were not interested in being a social entrepreneur. No respondent marked the others section which makes apparent here that majority of the respondents wants to become a social entrepreneur in the educational sector of Indonesia.

From the results in the table above, it can be interpreted that around 45% of the respondents of the study were in the favour of the statement that most common challenge faced by a Social entrepreneur is a lack of funds. In addition, 20% of the respondents were in the favour that lack of entrepreneurial education is the common challenge which is faced by the social entrepreneur. Furthermore, 17% of the respondents stated that formulating strategy was the most common challenge faced by the social entrepreneurs whereas 18% marked the option of others. This highlights that majority was in favour that funds are the major hurdle in the social entrepreneurship.

The table presented above highlights that if the respondents were interested in becoming a social entrepreneur in future, then what support they are expecting from the Indonesian government. In response to this question, 23% of the respondents reported that government will be helpful in providing adequate funds to the social entrepreneur. However, 19% of the respondents were in the favour that the government will be supportive in providing education about the social entrepreneurship. In addition, 19% of the respondents were in the opinion that Indonesian government will be helpful in providing ease of obtaining formal legality. Furthermore, approximately 18% of the respondents were in the favour that Indonesian government will be helpful in the continuity of the business. From the total responses, the majority of the reported that funds will be the best support expected from the Indonesian Government.

From the table presented above, the question statement was directed towards that the Indonesian Government provides adequate management consultancy and legal counselling to the social entrepreneurs in the country. To this question, 25% of the respondents out of 100 were in the favour of the statement that the government provides adequate support in terms of management consultancy and the legal counselling. In addition, around 15% of the respondents remained neutral to the statement which highlights either they were not aware of the question being asked by the researcher or does not want to comment on it. However, a total of 57% of the respondents negatively responded to the question. Therefore, the majority was not in the favour of the statement that the Indonesia government provision of adequate support to the social entrepreneurs.

According to the table presented above, the question statement was focused towards that the Indonesian Government provides adequate marketing support in terms of social entrepreneurship. The result to this question implies that 13% of the respondents out of 100 were in the favour of the statement that the government provides adequate support in terms of marketing of the social business of the social entrepreneur. In addition to the above statement, around 39% of the respondents remained neutral to the statement which reflects that either they were not aware of the question being asked by the researcher or does not want to comment on it. However, a total of 51% of the respondents did not respond positively towards the question statement. Therefore, the majority was not in the favour of the statement that the Indonesia government provision of adequate support business in terms of marketing for the help of the social entrepreneurs.

The results mentioned in the table presented above highlights that around 45% of the respondents were in the favour of the statement that Indonesian Government provides adequate financial support to the social entrepreneurs. On the other hand, there were 32% of the respondents who responded negatively to the question statement reflecting that either they were not aware of the question statement or does not want to comment on this statement. Approximately 23% of the respondents were not in the favour of the statement which is the reason they did not agree with the fact that government provide adequate financial support to the social entrepreneurs.

The results mentioned in the table presented above highlights that around 45% of the respondents were in the favour of the statement that Indonesian Government provides adequate financial support to the social entrepreneurs. On the other hand, there were 32% of the respondents who responded negatively to the question statement reflecting that either they were not aware of the question statement or does not want to comment on this statement. Approximately 23% of the respondents were not in the favour of the statement which is the reason they did not agree with the fact that government provide adequate financial support to the social entrepreneurs.

The results revealed in the table presented above reports that around 67% of the respondents which includes the scales of strongly agree and agree were in the support of the statement that the regulatory environments and the bureaucratic procedures are favourable for the Indonesian social entrepreneurs. On the other hand, there were 21% of the respondents who responded negatively to the question statement reflecting that either they were not aware of the question statement or does not want to comment on this statement. In addition, a total of 12% of the respondents were not in the favour of the statement.

From the table presented above, it can be asserted that majority of the respondents approximately at 57% were in the favour of the statement that social entrepreneurs have adequate capacities to facilitate the governmental procedures. However, there were 28% of the respondents who remained neutral with the question statement implying that they neither agreed not disagree with the statement. On the contrary side, there 15% of the respondents who completely disagree with the statement made by the researcher implying that majority of the Indonesian respondents supported the statement.

In the light of the table presented above, the question statement was focused towards that the government of Indonesia assist in providing new sources of the funding in the favour of social entrepreneurship. The result to this question implies that a total of 55% of the respondents out of 100 were in the favour of the statement that the government assist in funding the social entrepreneurship. Further to add in the analysis, around 30% of the respondents remained neutral to the statement which reflects that either they were not aware of the question being asked by the researcher or does not want to comment on it. Conversely, a total of 15% of the respondents did not respond positively towards the question statement.

According to the findings presented in the table above, the question statement was focused towards that Government assesses the performance of the social entrepreneurs’ business for supporting if the business is deficient in a certain direction. The result to this question implies that a total of 50% of the respondents out of 100 were in the favour of the question which includes the responses from the scale of strongly agree and disagree. In addition to the explanation of the research results for this question, around 21% of the respondents remained neutral to the statement which reflects that either they were not aware of the question being asked by the researcher or does not want to comment on it. Contrariwise, a total of 29% of the respondents were not in the favour of the question states that government take measures to support the deficient social businesses in the Indonesia.

The main theme presented in the table above is intended towards assessing the reviews that the government continue to boost the access of the funding for the social entrepreneurs. For this statement, the 28% of the respondents strongly agree with the statement whereas, 35% of the respondents agree with the statement that government should provide adequate support to boost the access of funding to the social entrepreneurs. In addition, there were 14% responses who remained neutral to this question explaining that either they were not aware of the question statement or does not want to comment on it. On the contrary side, there were 23% respondents in total who negatively responded to the statement.

The last question of the online survey was intended towards assessing whether the government should focus towards promoting the idea of innovation to the social entrepreneurs. In response to this question, 55% of the respondents were in the support of the statement the government should promote the idea of innovation in their social businesses. In addition, there were 32% of the respondents who remained neutral to the question being asked by the researcher in the online survey implying that they neither agreed nor disagree with this idea. On the different side, there were only 13% respondents who were not in the support of the statement that government of Indonesia should promote the idea of innovation in the business plan.

The table presented above represents the Pearson correlation which defines the strength of the relationship between the dependent and independent variables of the study. In this research, the independent variable is role of government and the dependent variable is the promotion of the social entrepreneurship with a specific focus in Indonesia. From the correlation value, it can be asserted that the correlation value of the variables is estimated at 0.764 or 76.4% which explains that if the role of the government increases then there will be significant promotion of social entrepreneurship in Indonesia. The value reflects the positive correlation between the role of government and the social entrepreneurship promotion in Indonesia. In addition, the Sig. (2-tailed) value is estimated at 0.000 which also implies a statistically significant correlation between the variables.